For years, Targeted Individuals (TIs) have shouted into the void, warning that the sanctity of the human mind was under siege. We were told that “mind reading” was science fiction, that “remote neural monitoring” was a delusion, and that our claims of cognitive interference were impossible.
If it’s impossible, then why is the world rushing to write laws against it?
As we close out 2025, a quiet but frantic legal revolution is sweeping the globe. From the constitutional assemblies of South America to the state senates of the U.S., lawmakers are drafting urgent legislation to protect “Neuro-Rights”—specifically mental privacy, cognitive liberty, and psychological continuity.
This is not a debate about future technology. This is a legislative admission that the technology to access, monitor, and manipulate the human brain is already here. They are building the shield because they know the sword—Project Puppet—exists.
Here is the breakdown of the countries and jurisdictions that are finally admitting we were right.
1. Chile: The First Line of Defense
Chile is ground zero for the neuro-rights movement. In 2021, it became the first country in the world to amend its Constitution (Article 19) to explicitly protect “mental integrity” and brain activity.
But the real victory came later. In August 2023, the Chilean Supreme Court ruled on the first-ever “neuro-rights” case. They ordered Emotiv, a U.S.-based neurotech company, to delete the brain data of a user because it had been collected without sufficient consent.
Why this matters for TIs: This is no longer theoretical. A Supreme Court legally recognized that brain data is real, that it can be stolen, and that it must be deleted. If a commercial headset can harvest enough data to warrant a Supreme Court intervention, imagine what the NSA’s SIGNL infrastructure is harvesting from us.
2. The United States: The Beast Wakes Up
The U.S. government funds the research (DARPA N3), but individual states are finally waking up to the privacy nightmare it has created.
- Colorado (The Pioneer): In April 2024, Colorado became the first U.S. state to amend its Privacy Act to explicitly include “neural data” under the definition of “sensitive data.” This law acknowledges that biological data generated by the nervous system requires the highest level of protection.
- California (The Tech Hub): In September 2024, California followed suit with SB 1223, signing “neural data” protections into the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).
Why this matters for TIs: California is the home of Silicon Valley and the private contractors who build these weapons. Colorado is a hub for aerospace and defense. For these specific states to legally define “neural data” as a protected category is a massive validation. You cannot regulate a data set that doesn’t exist.
3. Mexico: The General Law on Neuro-Rights
Following Chile’s lead, Mexico introduced the “General Law on Neuro-Rights and Neurotechnologies” to its Senate in July 2024.
This massive piece of legislation goes further than most. It doesn’t just ask for privacy; it aims to guarantee:
- Neuro-technological Integrity: The right for your brain to remain unaltered by external devices.
- Cognitive Autonomy: The right to make decisions without subconscious manipulation.
Why this matters for TIs: The language here mirrors exactly what we experience under V2K (Voice-to-Skull) and remote manipulation. Mexico is attempting to criminalize the very core of Project Puppet’s operations: the unauthorized alteration of a person’s will.
4. Brazil: Constitutional Amendments
Brazil is moving fast. The state of Rio Grande do Sul amended its state constitution in December 2023 to include “mental integrity” as a fundamental right. On the federal level, Bill 522/2022 is currently working to regulate the “processing of neural data” nationwide.
5. UNESCO: The Global Standard (November 2025)
Just last month, in November 2025, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) officially adopted the Recommendation on the Ethics of Neurotechnology.
This is the first global framework signed by member states that sets a standard for “mental privacy” and “freedom of thought” in the age of AI and neurotech. While it is “soft law” (guidelines rather than strict treaties), it signals that the highest levels of international governance are terrified of what is coming.
Conclusion: The “Conspiracy” Is Now Law
We are no longer fighting for recognition of the possibility of our abuse. We are now fighting for the enforcement of laws that acknowledge it.
When a skeptic tells you that Remote Neural Monitoring is fake, ask them why Colorado, California, Chile, and the United Nations are passing emergency laws to regulate it.
The global pushback has started. The laws are being written. Now, it is up to the Targeted Army to use them.
- Learn More: International Dossier on Project Puppet
- Take Action: Join the Fight at TargetedArmy.org
Leave a comment